Last week I had the joy of being called an
apostate evangelist because of a book I had on my recommended reading list. I'm not even sure exactly what an apostate evangelist is, but I don't think it was a compliment. I just thought this was an opportunity to process how I process stuff like this.
For starters, I always try to
stay positive on my blog. There is way too much
sideways energy in the kingdom. If something says or does something heretical or blasphemous, then we need to call a spade a spade. But there are lots of Christians taking
pot shots at other Christians. I've decided
not to defend myself. I probably wouldn't have time for anything else. But I do want to set the record straight.
I have officially removed my
recommended reading list from my blog. Let me explain why. I read a ton of books. I used to read about 150 books per year. I now read closer to 50-75 books per year. And my
reading list includes
lots of books by lots of people I have issue with theologically or personally. I love
spiritual classics by people like Tozer or Chambers that I agree with lock, stock, and barrel. But I also like reading books that I
don't totally agree with because it
makes me think. And it's sort of disingenuous to
not believe in something you don't even know about. I read lots of non-Christian authors as part of my
cultural exegesis. Long story short, I had some books listed that I enjoyed reading personally. They made me
think in new ways or gave me
insight into culture or even helped me
understand why I
don't believe what I don't believe. And while they are written by people who don't have a Christian worldview, they resulted in
a better understanding of Scripture and
a closer relationship with Christ. Yes, that's possible!
But here's the thing:I put them through my
seminary filter. I'm able to digest them in ways that
absorbs the nutrients and
gets rid of the waste. But I'm afraid that my recommendations
might be viewed as an endorsement of everything these authors stand for as writers and people. It's definitely
not. So while I think it's laughable that someone calls me an "
apostate evangelist" because of one book I've read, this is an instance where I've decided to
error on the side of caution because I know that
with visibility comes greater accountability. And if my
recommended reading list is a
stumbling block it's not worth it. Listen, while NCC is somewhat
unorthodox in practice we are absolutely
orthodox in belief by any historical standard. And
Scripture is the final authority when it comes to truth.
I guess what I'm saying is this: I've learned to
choose my battles wisely. And this isn't the hill where I want to fight. It's not important enough. What's so ironic is that I've taken it on the chin from several sides because of an author whose early writings I enjoyed but has become more of a syncretist whom I absolutely disagree with!
For what it's worth, I talked about
not majoring in minors this past weekend. Paul warns Timothy against arguments that
waste time and
start fights. I'm just not going to go there. I don't get negative. And I don't defend myself. Life is too short. And the mission is too important.
One request.
Can we put down our stones? We're so quick to
stone one another while the world watches! It's an embarrassment. How can we
love the world if we can't stop
fighting with each other?
Trying to
keep it real.